How does the stock market perform when the VIX fear gauge surges?
With stock market volatility spiking due to the coronavirus, we look at what’s happened to returns in the past after similar turbulence.
The spread of the coronavirus has sent shock waves through global stock markets.
Alongside plummeting share prices, the VIX index, the market’s so-called fear gauge, has shot up.
At the time of writing, on 28 February, it stands at over 40.
This is very high compared to long-term norms. Since 1990, it has averaged 19 and as recently as mid-February it stood at only 14.
The VIX reflects the amount of volatility traders expect for the US’ S&P 500 stock market index during the next 30 days.
No one can say for certain how the spread of the coronavirus will evolve, but we can look at how stock markets have performed in the past during periods of heightened fear.
The emotional response to such situations is to sell. Historically, however, this would have been the wrong thing to do.
The chart below shows how the S&P 500 has performed when the VIX has been in different percentiles of its history.
For example, 5% of the time the VIX has been below 11.3 and 5% of the time it has been between 11.3 and 11.9, and so on. This breakdown allows us to derive the most meaningful data.
The current reading of over 40 puts the VIX in the top bracket of historical experience.
However, rather than being an opportune time to sell, historically this has been when the best returns have been earned – for the brave hearted.
On average, the S&P 500 has generated a return of over 25% in the 12 months after the VIX breached 32.9.
Next 12 month S&P 500 return based on different starting VIX
Each range corresponds to 5% of historic experience for the VIX
Furthermore, a strategy which sold out of stocks (S&P 500) and went into cash on a daily basis whenever the VIX entered this top bucket, then shifted back into stocks whenever it dipped back below, would have underperformed a strategy which remained continually invested in stocks by 2.5% a year since 1991 (6.7% a year vs 9.2% a year, ignoring any costs).
A $100 investment in the fully invested portfolio in January 1990 would have grown to be worth more than twice as much as $100 invested in the switching portfolio.
As with all investment, the past is not necessarily a guide to the future but history suggests that periods of heightened fear, as we are experiencing in at present, have been better for stock market investing than might have been expected.
This article is issued by Cazenove Capital which is part of the Schroders Group and a trading name of Schroder & Co. Limited, 1 London Wall Place, London EC2Y 5AU. Authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation Authority.
Nothing in this document should be deemed to constitute the provision of financial, investment or other professional advice in any way. Past performance is not a guide to future performance. The value of an investment and the income from it may go down as well as up and investors may not get back the amount originally invested.
This document may include forward-looking statements that are based upon our current opinions, expectations and projections. We undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements. Actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements.
All data contained within this document is sourced from Cazenove Capital unless otherwise stated.