The rise of 'meta cities' and the impact on real estate investing
The rise of 'meta cities' and the impact on real estate investing
Urbanisation will be the defining trend of the next 25 years. It will underpin where and how we live, how we work and what goods and services we will use.
Cities are the focal point of the global economy and certain cities are winning the race to attract companies and employees. This is because idea creation trumps manufacturing. That trend is now taking on another leg with the emergence of meta cities, led by China.
What is a meta city?
At Schroders Global Cities, we use the term meta city to describe the linking of mega cities via high speed transport and critical infrastructure. In so doing, the sum of these interlinked cities become economically more powerful than the parts.
A meta city is, essentially, numerous mega cities forming a single economic area. China is currently looking at three meta cities where the country's economic output will be focused: GBA (Pearl River), Beijing (including Tianjin and Heibei and known as ‘Jing Jin Ji’) and Yangtse River. This spend will have an outsized impact as the chart below, grouping the three meta cities together, shows:
Jing Jin Ji will be home to 130 million people, six times the New York metro area. A new proposed airport at Beijing Dashin will cater for 430 million passengers per year, covering 660 acres and costing an estimated $13 billion.
This huge investment in infrastructure is central to the viability of these meta cities. The ease of movement of people, goods and data is the reason behind outsized economic performance.
Despite these large numbers, it is clear that the urbanisation trend is still in its infancy in Asia.
The knowledge economy effect
Why are people being concentrated into focused geographies to such a degree that a large proportion of the world’s population will live in mega and meta cities, according to UN statistics?
The simple answer is the importance of idea creation in the knowledge economy. Peter Hall, in his ‘World Cities’ book of the 1960s, makes the point that cities first came into being as a place where capital formation took place. During and post the Industrial revolution, advisers such as lawyers, accountants and financiers were located in cities, providing services to new industries. Factories often were remote to cities with largely self-contained workforces. That has changed.
The knowledge economy is now pre-eminent. To compete and survive it has never been more important to be within the crucible of where ideas are formulated – cities. The argument that technology facilitates remote working is true but misses the crucial point of why people are ‘recentralising’. Technology has increased the ability to communicate; logically we should all be living increasingly decentralised lives. However, the opposite is true. In the knowledge economy the need to be directly connected – face to face – with people is vital. Proof of this is the rise of co-working providers like WeWork now in 74 cities and with 220,000 members, as well as the huge rise in air travel.
The trend in urbanisation from large cities, to mega cities and now meta cities is a function of this recentralisation. Cities provide economies of scale to private enterprise and government led infrastructure projects.
The Urban Age
The Industrial Revolution saw technological advancement in manufacturing and transport.
The current tech revolution is reshaping lives in multiple ways. Urban formation is the most important area. Tech is shaping cities and is, itself, being shaped by idea collision from the leading urban areas. Cities allow people to be a part of the knowledge economy, creating career opportunities across a broad spectrum of jobs.
The future iteration of urbanisation is the meta city. Governments and investors who understand the importance of connecting large cities will provide their citizens with the ability to have a stake in the knowledge economy.
If the knowledge economy is based on people being in close proximity to formulate, test and deploy ideas, then cities are increasingly critical to this growth.
The rise of the knowledge economy in certain cities is apparent: their success is anchored by outstanding universities and research centres and excellent transport hubs facilitating face to face meetings. This has often been at the expense of post-industrial manufacturing cities.
Meta cities are the next leg in the explosive growth in urbanisation, the turbo-charging of the need to live and work in closer proximity in order to be a part of the tech revolution.
We think that the three Chinese meta cities are just the start. Mega cities will go meta as governments rush to link large cities and expand smaller ones. The focus of this will be Asia, as populations continue to grow. This impact will create dense urban geographies whose economic output is outsized relative to the country hinterland.
- Our global cities team launched the Global Cities blog in 2016, which acts as a resource to track the longer term trends impacting global real estate. The index uses a number of factors to identify the most economically vibrant cities across the world. More is explained here.
- Webinar: what comes after the volatility of 2020?
- Planning for a higher rate of capital gains tax
- "Great companies are improved by a crisis"
- Has Covid-19 changed the conversation around sustainable investing?
- Peter Harrison: why climate change is creating a 1929 moment
- Outlook 2021: our view of the risks and opportunities
This article is issued by Cazenove Capital which is part of the Schroders Group and a trading name of Schroder & Co. Limited, 1 London Wall Place, London EC2Y 5AU. Authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation Authority.
Nothing in this document should be deemed to constitute the provision of financial, investment or other professional advice in any way. Past performance is not a guide to future performance. The value of an investment and the income from it may go down as well as up and investors may not get back the amount originally invested.
This document may include forward-looking statements that are based upon our current opinions, expectations and projections. We undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements. Actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements.
All data contained within this document is sourced from Cazenove Capital unless otherwise stated.