The three Cs driving WFH and their impact on global cities
The three Cs driving WFH and their impact on global cities
Recent encouraging news regarding a Covid-19 vaccine means many of us are looking forward to resuming our “normal” lives. Getting out of the house will be top priority for many, particularly those of us in countries that have re-entered lockdown this autumn.
But will we be heading back to the office? The pandemic’s effect on our working lives has been profound. It has certainly dispelled any myths around “shirking from home” with many companies finding that their employees can be just as, if not more, productive at home as in the office. The key question to answer is how damaging Covid-19 will be to long-term office demand.
We think there are three primary forces working together and leading to market change: commuting, culture and Covid-19. Importantly, these three forces will play out differently in different global cities, making a nuanced picture for investors.
Firstly, different countries have handled the pandemic with varying degrees of success so far. While many of us in Europe are experiencing a second lockdown, some Asian countries dealt with the virus very effectively.
Despite being the initial centre of the virus, China has been successful in containing it and enabling normal activity, including office work, to resume in its cities. Other examples include Hong Kong, Singapore, Tokyo, Sydney and Oslo.
Cities that have contained the pandemic have seen less disruption to normal working patterns and therefore a more muted work from home (WFH) trend. By contrast, when the authorities’ handling of the pandemic has been less successful, the working from home trend has been more pronounced. London is a case in point here, along with New York.
It is also worth noting that both these cities have a large amount of high rise buildings. Moving large numbers of people around a skyscraper is almost impossible when you have to adhere to social distancing.
However, the popularity of working from home isn’t purely down to the spread of the virus. Commuting is also a crucial factor, in our view.
London employees, for example, are among those most keen to continue to work from home. The chart below shows the results of a survey taken in mid-September – well after the UK’s first lockdown had ended and before the current pick-up in the virus. Londoners were far more likely than other European office workers to be still working from home.
But London office workers don’t just live in the city; many live in the surrounding suburbs and travel in via multiple modes of transport. Even those who do live fairly centrally often have long travel times given London’s low population density. Employees may be reluctant to return to offices due to the virus, but many also value the time and money freed up by the lack of commute.
Of course, a prime reason for living outside the city are the high costs associated with living in major cities. In suburban locations, living costs are lower, potentially giving people space for a home office. Clearly, this makes working from home a lot easier.
However, a big house isn’t an option in more densely populated locations such as Singapore or Hong Kong, where virtually everyone lives in a flat. Not only does this often mean people live in closer proximity to the office, but lack of space makes working from home less practical. Excellent public transport also means shorter commutes.
Meanwhile, other cities are more accessible by car, enabling commuters to avoid the risk of infection on public transport. We would point to some of the US Sun Belt cities here - Austin, Atlanta or Charlotte, for example - as well as some German cities.
Our third force is culture. For cities such as London, the pandemic didn’t start the working from home trend; it accelerated a shift that was already happening. Modern office developments are no longer let on the basis of one desk for one employee; shared workspaces help employers save costs and employees embrace flexible working practices. Expensive, time-consuming commutes and a desire for better work-life balance were already seeing many office workers choose to work from home for a day or two per week.
By contrast, a culture of needing to be present in the office still prevails in many places; Japan is often singled out here.
We would also point to culture beyond the office too. The current pandemic has been described as “unprecedented” in many quarters but for many Asian cities, it isn’t. Similar virus outbreaks have occurred in the recent past, notably SARS in 2003 which centred on China, Hong Kong and Vietnam.
It’s partly because of these outbreaks, as well as seasonal colds and flu, that people in many Asian cities are already accustomed to measures like wearing a face mask. In cities such as Tokyo or Hong Kong, wearing a mask not perceived as an inconvenience or a reason not to go about your business as usual.
In addition, even as recently as 2003, the technology simply wasn’t advanced enough for people to work from home. Broadband speeds have increased to a sufficiently high speed to enable a trend that was previously impossible.
We can see these trends come together in the chart below, which compares mobility trends in Tokyo to various UK cities. UK mobility fell sharply during the initial lockdown and recovery has been very slow. By contrast, mobility in Tokyo didn’t fall so far, and has been quicker to recover towards normal levels.
Select your office exposure carefully
These three themes – Covid-19, commuting and culture - all intersect and are creating the varied picture we see in terms of the return to the office globally. For some cities, home-working was on the rise anyway and is likely to lead to reduced office demand. However, we think employers will always want to retain an office presence, even if not every employee is working there every day.
A recent report by Barclays found that office-based employers expect work-from-home days to rise on average to two per week, from 0.9 pre-pandemic. Offices may end up being smaller if fewer people are working in them each day. But we think this will emphasise their importance as a hub, where employees can meet and exchange ideas.
From an employer’s perspective, the collaboration and idea generation that happens when people are together in the office is crucial. Workers also need to make connections with new colleagues and train junior staff. These things are not impossible when working virtually but they are easier face to face. Even maintaining existing work relationships becomes harder if communication is solely via email or Zoom for a prolonged period.
Those cities that are most impacted are likely to have longer commute times and a high cost of living; London and New York are prime examples. In contrast, smaller living areas and shorter commute times will reduce the adoption of working from home; the likes of Hong Kong and Singapore neatly fit this description.
The reality for many is that a new hybrid working life will now be normal. The winds of change were already pushing real estate markets in this direction - Covid-19 has just accelerated the inevitable.
- The banking sector: do investors need to worry?
- ECB stands resolute and hikes rates
- Whatever happened to the US recession?
- Spring Budget a welcome surprise for “experienced” individuals
- Silicon Valley Bank: what are the implications?
- UK economy returns to growth in January
This article is issued by Cazenove Capital which is part of the Schroders Group and a trading name of Schroder & Co. Limited, 1 London Wall Place, London EC2Y 5AU. Authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation Authority.
Nothing in this document should be deemed to constitute the provision of financial, investment or other professional advice in any way. Past performance is not a guide to future performance. The value of an investment and the income from it may go down as well as up and investors may not get back the amount originally invested.
This document may include forward-looking statements that are based upon our current opinions, expectations and projections. We undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements. Actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements.
All data contained within this document is sourced from Cazenove Capital unless otherwise stated.