Will decarbonisation be the mega-trend of the next decade?
Will decarbonisation be the mega-trend of the next decade?
US equities have led global stock markets higher over the past decade. In the last ten years, US equities have returned a stellar 292%, compared to just 73% for global equities (as measured by the MSCI USA Index and MSCI AC World ex US Index respectively, in US dollar terms, as at 31 August 2020).
But the past isn’t always a good guide to the future. As climate change moves up the political and social agenda, decarbonisation could be the mega-trend of the next decade. And we think many of the companies best placed for the transition to a low carbon future are listed outside the US.
Who are the major wind and solar players?
The US has a number of companies who are the dominant players in their field. But this isn’t always the case if we look at renewable energy.
Take the wind energy industry, which is dominated globally by a handful of companies. Only one of the major manufacturers – GE – is a US firm. The biggest global operators are Denmark’s Vestas Wind and the German-Spanish group Siemens Gamesa. Chinese firms tend to have a strong focus on their domestic market.
Meanwhile, the solar industry is heavily dominated by Chinese firms. China leads the way in the production of polysilicon, as well as in solar cell manufacturing capacity. This is a fairly commoditised industry, with limited scope for generating above-average profit margins. Nonetheless, if there is a boom in solar then it is these Chinese firms who will benefit. First Solar, a US company, is one of the only notable non-Chinese firms in the industry.
What about electric vehicles?
When it comes to pure electric vehicles, US-listed Tesla is the brand name everyone knows. It currently leads the way in terms of sales of battery electric vehicles (BEVs), as opposed to hybrids.
But that dominance may not last much longer. Germany’s Volkswagen has high ambitions for BEV production, and is poised to overtake Tesla by 2025 when it is targeting 1.4 million BEV sales. The Renault/Nissan/Mitsubishi alliance – producers of the Leaf – and China’s Geely are also poised to catch Tesla by 2025 (source: CNN Business 2019.)
From a decarbonisation point of view, the important part of a battery electric vehicle is the battery. Here again, non-US firms are the market leaders. The battery supply chain is dominated by Asian companies such as South Korea’s LG Chem and Samsung SDI, Japan’s Panasonic, and CATL in China.
US and European car firms may try to source more batteries locally as they ramp up production of BEVs, but for now the technical know-how resides with these Asian companies.
It is also the case that the main buyers of electric vehicles currently are Chinese and European consumers. This faster market adoption will bring economies of scale, development of technical knowhow, and faster growth in related services businesses to support the EV industry.
Is hydrogen the new frontier?
Much of the conversation around decarbonisation focuses on the use of electricity from renewable sources. However, hydrogen could be an alternative energy source for industries that are hard to decarbonise using electricity.
Hydrogen can be produced from fossil fuels with the emissions from the process captured via carbon capture and storage (CCS) technologies. It can also be produced via renewable power, and over the coming five to ten years this renewable (emission free) derived hydrogen is likely to become cheaper than fossil fuel hydrogen.
The advantage of hydrogen is that it does not emit carbon dioxide when burned in an engine. Converting hydrogen into electricity can also take place via a hydrogen fuel cell, which consumes hydrogen and oxygen. When a fuel cell is continuously supplied with hydrogen and oxygen, the fuel cell can generate electricity with water as the only by-product.
Hydrogen can also be used to store surplus power produced via renewable sources. This power can then be used at a time when wind and solar are not producing electricity, smoothing out the peaks and troughs of renewables production.
Currently the cost of producing hydrogen is elevated and this has weighed on demand. However, the sharp reduction in the cost of other green energy sources in recent years indicates that hydrogen will follow the same path.
Japan and Europe are currently the leaders in developing hydrogen power. Japan adopted its “Basic Hydrogen Strategy” back in 2017 with the aim of reducing hydrogen costs to the same level as conventional energy sources, thereby ensuring energy security and reducing emissions.
Our Data Insights Unit used its expertise in managing alternative data sets to analyse which companies are registering the most patents related to hydrogen production. They found that the top three were all Japanese firms: Toshiba, Honda and Asahi Kasei.
In addition, European companies such as Siemens, Thyssen, NEL, and ITM are all at the forefront of the development of hydrogen electrolysis equipment. The EU’s new investment programme to build out a hydrogen infrastructure is likely to give these companies a major head-start over foreign competition in this early stage of the industry development.
A hydrogen strategy forms part of the European Union’s recently-announced Green Deal. The strategy set out an ambition for one million tonnes of renewable hydrogen to be produced by 2024, rising to ten million tonnes by 2030.
Decarbonisation boosted by political will
Europe has often been on the front foot when it comes to recognising the climate challenge on the political agenda. Asian countries are fast catching up in this regard though too.
The same urgency to tackle climate change and switch to renewable power sources has so far been lacking in the US. This could partially account for why US corporates are currently relative laggards in the decarbonisation journey.
There have been some ambitious recent decarbonisation policies and ambitions from the likes of Microsoft and Amazon. But in general European companies are much more focused on decarbonising their own operations and supply chains, with more ambitious long term goals aligned to the Paris Agreement goal of limiting temperature increases to 2 degrees, and intermediate milestones along the way to track them against.
The table below demonstrates this. Our Sustainable Investment Team analysed over 10,000 global companies for their commitment to science based target initiatives (SBTIs) on climate change. SBTI essentially means having a strategy committing the company to greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction targets consistent with the pace recommended by climate scientists to limit the worst impacts of climate change.
The regional differences are striking. Despite accounting for only 13% of listed companies analysed, Western European companies account for 38% of the total number with science based targets. North American companies only make up 22% of this group, despite being 26% of the listed universe.
There is also a higher proportion of listed companies in Developed Asia, Latin America, and Emerging Europe committed to science based climate targets than there is in North America.
It is clear that European companies are much further down the path of optimising their operations for a rapid transition to a low carbon economy, something that will help them competitively as carbon emissions become a more significant liability in future.
As we go into a phase where carbon taxes and carbon prices rise are likely to rise globally to address climate change, this head-start in reducing their own emissions will become a more valuable competitive and cost advantage.
The US stock market dominance of the past decade has largely been thanks to the strong performance of a handful of major stocks in a few key sectors. The FAANGs (Facebook, Amazon, Apple, Netflix, Google) have led the way.
These fantastic companies will likely continue to be leaders in their fields. However, with momentum growing around the need for a low carbon future, we think stock market investors should pay heed to the leadership role that non-US companies are taking in decarbonisation.
Any references to stocks/companies are for illustrative purposes only and not a recommendation to buy and/or sell. Reliance should not be placed on any views or information in the material when taking individual investment and/or strategic decisions. If you are unsure as to the suitability of any investment speak to a independent financial advisor
The value of investments and the income from them may go down as well as up and investors may not get back the amounts originally invested.
- Election 2020: the year in US markets
- What would be the environmental and social impact of a Biden presidency?
- Biden vs Trump: what are markets telling us?
- What’s the short-term economic impact of climate change?
- Proxy voting: how we influence corporate behaviour around the world
- Is value investing really dead?
This article is issued by Cazenove Capital which is part of the Schroders Group and a trading name of Schroder & Co. Limited, 1 London Wall Place, London EC2Y 5AU. Authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation Authority.
Nothing in this document should be deemed to constitute the provision of financial, investment or other professional advice in any way. Past performance is not a guide to future performance. The value of an investment and the income from it may go down as well as up and investors may not get back the amount originally invested.
This document may include forward-looking statements that are based upon our current opinions, expectations and projections. We undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements. Actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements.
All data contained within this document is sourced from Cazenove Capital unless otherwise stated.