Active versus passive investing: the decision is not binary
Alex Baily, Portfolio Director, investigates...
The passive market has grown exponentially over the past decade and in recent years, many investment columns have been devoted to the socalled ‘active versus passive’ debate.
Those in favour of actively-managed funds highlight that fund managers can take advantage of investment opportunities as they arise, in addition to those created by market volatility. In contrast, they claim passive funds have little flexibility to ‘swim against the tide’ and therefore guarantee underperformance (after fees).
The passive cohort, however, highlight the reams of academic studies that show a large portion of active managers underperform the market and there is the perennial question of fees.
In our opinion, it is not about choosing one side over the other. We believe the active versus passive debate is outdated because it is not a binary decision to invest in an actively managed fund over a tracker fund, or vice versa. For us, it is simply about selecting the most appropriate investment vehicle that will achieve the best outcome for our clients.
Initially, we make an asset allocation decision such as increasing exposure to a specific part of the market because it looks attractive. We then assess both the active and passive opportunities and carefully analyse the most suitable one for the client depending on their risk profile and objectives.
Finding the right tracker
Making a decision to simply ‘buy the market’ via an Index Tracker Fund or an Exchange Traded Fund (ETF) is not as simple as you might expect.
Like actively-managed funds, passive funds have their intricacies so it is important to look under the bonnet to ensure you understand what you are buying. Here are a few pointers to help with the process:
Fund or ETF?
In a particular quarter or year, passives will not completely replicate the performance of an index. This is down to the fact that they have different costs and structures, and are priced at different times of the day, so you can expect some degree of performance drift. An ETF is a listed security that can be traded through the day. In contrast, an index tracker is a mutual fund that is priced once a day, normally at noon. Fees can differ amongst providers.
What is being tracked?
When investing in a collection of markets, it is important to understand how the different exposures break down and be able to identify what is actually being tracked. This is especially true for emerging markets and Asiafocused ETFs or index trackers, offering exposure to broad regions. The breakdown of how much is allocated to each country can vary from product to product, so it is important to make sure that the underlying exposures are appropriate and acceptable. In addition, it is worthwhile confirming how often the portfolio is rebalanced to ensure that it does not drift too far away from the index.
Tracking bond markets passively can also prove challenging. If the aim is simply to track a bond index via a mainstream market cap-weighted product, the highest allocations will be to those countries and companies with the greatest amount of debt issuance. This may not necessarily be a sensible decision. In the high yield asset class the performance of the passive offerings has diverged significantly from the index at times.
How does it work?
It is important to distinguish whether a fund or ETF is physically backed by the underlying index it is tracking, or replicates the index using ‘synthetics’:
1. If it takes the physical route it means the fund buys all (or most) of the underlying shares in the index.
2. Synthetic replication works completely differently in so far as you are effectively buying a contract with a third party, normally an investment bank, to provide you with the same return offered by the index. The third party does not need to hold all of the shares within the index, but they should hold some collateral. This can be in the form of shares, although these may not necessarily be in line with the index you are seeking to track. It is important to monitor what shares are held.
This article is issued by Cazenove Capital which is part of the Schroder Group and a trading name of Schroder & Co. Limited, 1 London Wall Place, London EC2Y 5AU. Authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation Authority. Nothing in this document should be deemed to constitute the provision of financial, investment or other professional advice in any way. Past performance is not a guide to future performance. The value of an investment and the income from it may go down as well as up and investors may not get back the amount originally invested. This document may include forward-looking statements that are based upon our current opinions, expectations and projections. We undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements. Actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements. All data contained within this document is sourced from Cazenove Capital unless otherwise stated.