How cyber risk has changed post Covid
How cyber risk has changed post Covid
It might not be surprising that cyber criminals have taken advantage of coronavirus and the rush to remote working. The age of cyber warfare was upon us even before the crisis.
New research suggests online fraudsters are boosting their attacks at an alarming pace, and it’s thought multimillion dollar ransoms could be at stake.
Interpol, the inter-governmental organisation which helps police in 194 member countries, has assessed cyber crime since the Covid-19 pandemic. It has reported that criminals have shifted their targets to big firms, governments and infrastructure.
Meanwhile PwC’s Threat Intelligence team found that by 20 May this year more than 150 organisations globally had their data published on leak sites. More than 60% occurred after 11 March when the World Health Organisation first declared the Covid outbreak to be a pandemic.
Garmin, the smart-watch maker, camera-maker Canon, and technology giant Intel are among recently-reported victims of hacking.
Andrew Howard, Global Head of Sustainable Investment at Schroders, says the crisis is “accelerating a shift in business models, which exacerbates the threats”.
He adds: “Our own analysis shows increased cyber attacks registered by US enforcement agencies, for example. Failure to manage that risk could prove fatal to companies in a world where regulations and fines for breaches are becoming punitive.
“As an active investor, we will continue to actively question those we believe are falling short of expectations.”
Our Sustainable Investment Analyst Ovidiu Patrascu explains in more detail.
Why should investors care about increased cyber attacks?
"Cyber is an increasingly critical source of business risk, especially for companies with important intangible assets such as brands, customer relationships or technology. The negative impact a data breach can have on a brand links straight to a company's competitiveness, future revenues and future cash flows.
"Data breaches often uncover poor governance practices and weak management. Changing people or policies is quick but re-establishing market and customer trust take much longer."
How does targeted company engagement help tackle cyber crime risks?
"In our view, investors should focus on understanding how well a company prepares for cyber events. The depth of its approach should give confidence that when (not if) a breach occurs, processes and resources are in place to minimise the impact.
"Building that understanding means going beyond a formulaic assessment of policies. We believe direct company engagements are the best way to gain insights. We have delved into the topic focusing on a few main areas – governance, expertise and technology. We have engaged with Chief Information Security Officers (CISO) or Data Protection Officers (DPOs) across sectors such as financial services, technology and telecoms."
What should companies be doing to minimise risks of cyber crime?
"It is critical that the company has a well-resourced and specialised cyber security team, managed by a CISO or DPO, preferably reporting to the CEO or the board. The security team should also leverage specialised external expertise on a regular basis to stay on top of new threats and security tools. Internally, the team should have direct ownership of specific technological tasks such as penetration testing, a simulated cyber attack.
"The board should have specific expertise to evaluate whether the company has the appropriate operational and managerial resources to mitigate cyber risk."
- Earlier this summer Schroders’ sustainable investment team shared how sustainability will be fundamental to progress in the face of some “inescapable truths”. The fast-tracking of digital life is one of six key areas that point to a changing role of the corporate sector in society.
The opinions contained herein are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the house view. This document is intended to be for information purposes only. The material is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument. The material is not intended to provide, and should not be relied on for, accounting, legal or tax advice, or investment recommendations. Information herein is believed to be reliable but Cazenove Capital does not warrant its completeness or accuracy. No responsibility can be accepted for errors of fact or opinion. This does not exclude or restrict any duty or liability that Cazenove Capital has to its customers under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (as amended from time to time) or any other regulatory system. Cazenove Capital is part of the Schroder Group and a trading name of Schroder & Co. Registered Office at 1 London Wall Place, London EC2Y 5AU. Authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation Authority. For your security, communications may be taped and monitored.