Value for money
The fees charged to charities by their investment managers are in the spotlight. However, there is no common approach or methodology for reporting or looking at them. Fees are often bundled or estimated, leading to a difference between those stated and those actually paid. In an era of low interest rates and low global growth, precious basis points of positive returns can be eroded through fees. The introduction of European financial regulation, MiFID II, requires companies providing investment management services to be more transparent than ever about the fees they charge. But even then, Trustees will need to ensure they are getting the best value for money out of their investment managers.
Kate Rogers, Head of Policy, and Giles Neville, Head of Charities at Cazenove Capital, have run a series of working groups with a collection of charity representatives from all backgrounds addressing this topic. Amy Browne, Portfolio Manager at Cazenove Charities, summarises their findings and sets out some practical insights to guide your way through the process of assessing value for money.
The report will will also cover the following:
What are you paying your investment managers to do?
What are you trying to achieve with your charity’s assets?
How much would you be prepared to pay for a target return of inflation +4%?
If better off net of fees, does the outright fee level matter?
What are the measurable and unmeasurable outcomes you expect to see?
Is it worth paying for active investment management?